Recent Posts


German Chancellor admits shutting nuclear plants was a “serious strategic mistake” — will rebuild nuclear

German Nuclear Power Plant

Phillippsburg Nuclear Power Plant by Lothar Neumann, Gernsbach [1]

By Jo Nova

How fast was this backflip? How big was this mistake…

Germany shut down its last three reactors in April 2023, but three years later, they’ve realized it was a terrible mistake and want to rebuild them or put small modular reactors “likely on the same sites”.

After 66 years of operating nuclear power without any major accidents, the irony was that Germany shut down its nuclear industry mostly because other countries had accidents. But now they admit they need more electricity.

This would be one of the biggest backdowns in the fake renewables “transition”.  Germany is the third largest economy in the world, and Chancellor Merz said this openly at a business conference a few days ago, but the mass media have said nothing.

The media groups that have reported it are niche outlets with names like Deseret News, TVPWorld, and American Thinker.

Translations from the video below:

Chancellor Merz “It was a serious strategic mistake to exit nuclear energy. We are now undertaking the most expensive energy transition in the entire world. I know of no other country that makes things so difficult for its own industry.”
“To have acceptable market prices for energy production again, we would have to permanently subsidise energy prices from the federal budget,” Merz said, adding: “We can’t do this in the long run.”
“If you are going to do it, you should at least have left the last remaining nuclear power plant in Germany on the grid three years ago, so that you at least have the electricity generation capacity that we had up until then,” he said.
Abdulvehab Ejup reports on TRT World  — the Turkish Public Broadcaster.
Germany once had 19 nuclear power plants, which provided more than a quarter of its electricity, but now they are bleeding industrial power, losing solar, wind power, EVs and now AI before it has barely started:
Germany, meanwhile, is watching the digital economy and the jobs that come with it flow to nations with cheaper, more reliable electricity. And Berlin’s solution seems to be if you can’t beat them, join them. Merz has dropped German opposition to nuclear energy in EU law, opening the door for German companies to invest in French small modular reactor projects.
Two years ago a study showed that if Germany just kept nuclear power, it could have saved $600b and cut emissions by 73%. If the Greens cared about emissions they would have been begging Germany to keep nuclear power. But it was never about “the science” was it?
Trump was right in 2018 when he told Germany they were on the wrong track, and they laughed at him..

REFERENCES

Other outlets : The Brussels SignalDeseret News, TVPWorld, The Brussels Signal, aa.com, and American Thinker.

Related blog posts:

After 3 years without nuclear power, Germany is changing its mind. Why?

h/t Bally in Q

10 out of 10 based on 89 ratings

74 comments to German Chancellor admits shutting nuclear plants was a “serious strategic mistake” — will rebuild nuclear

  • #
    Andy Demmig

    Just the speach and words of the current german chancellor don’t last until the next day. He is the puppet of the sozialist SPD party. His own and very intensive wish only is, to stay as the chancellor. The people and german industry “don’t scratch him”

    180

    • #
      Graham Richards

      My comment from the last article still stands:-

      Graham Richards
      January 17, 2026 at 8:46 am · Reply
      My Lord, I am enjoying this….. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

      There ain’t enough popcorn in the world to see us thru this clown show!

      Of course the clowns in Canberra believe they’re more clever than the Germans. So they’ll carry on merrily down the same road hoping for a Dreamtime miracle to save us!!

      220

      • #
        Patt Mac

        Highest transition costs in the world? Aaaaand blackout bowen says “hold my beer”

        80

        • #
          Ted1

          That is because he knows that the longer he holds out the nearer it will bring him to his goal , the destruction of the cappitalist system’s

          81

  • #
    tonyb

    You do wonder if politicians ever think through the consequences of their actions. It seems they come up with what they think is a great idea, vote on it then instruct someone to do their bidding.

    That someone is probably thinking “are they mad? This is a daft idea. Almost as daft as their last one.”

    480

    • #
      Ted1

      I don’t wonder what they think. I know what they think. And it’s evil.

      80

    • #
      oeman50

      Excellent point, Tony. Obama liked to say “we” increased the MPG of cars. “We (or “He”) did no such thing. The government put out an edict and expected the automobile industry engineers to actually accomplish that goal. Obama did do something, which was diddly squat.

      40

  • #
    John in NZ

    New Zealand is still focused on Net Zero policies. I asked the New Zealand Prime Minister, Chris Luxon about the cost of Net Zero policies to the average New Zealander and gave as an example how the cost of subsidising Wind and Solar generation raises costs. He interrupted me to say they are not subsidised. There wasn’t time at the meeting to explain in full so I wrote him an open letter which you can read at
    https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/john-riddell-subsidies-for-renewable-electricity-generation-increase-our-electricity-bills

    532

    • #
      Lawrie

      A great explanation John, if your PM reads it. I think those infected with the climate bug seldom read or hear alternative views let alone act upon them. That letter could easily be sent to our climate controller, Minister Chris Bowen, and received with the same look of a vacant mind.

      390

    • #
      Greg in NZ

      Heard a brief news item the other day about a [green, planet-saving] wind turbine bursting into flames down farmerbraun’s way causing the whole plantation to be shutdown while it was ‘fixed’ or decommissioned: no word since.

      And don’t start me on prime sheep & beef farms being sold & trans-formed into [Little Lucifer Firestarters™️] pine plantations to ‘suck’ carbon [sic] out of the air: madness, however profitable.

      300

      • #
        ozfred

        At least pine plantations final product (power poles and fence posts) will benefit the infrastructure of the country.
        Can you say “blue gum plantations”

        20

        • #
          John in NZ

          That would be a fair point if the pine plantations were farmed with the intention of harvest. I cannot help think of the effort that went into clearing the land to
          make sheep pasture out of hill country. Now its being turned into a fire hazard. OK. Not as bad as gum trees but still. I worked a summer on a hill country farm and spent a lot of time cutting scrub with a slasher getting paid about $1 per hour. I knew blokes getting $5 per hour for scrub cutting. I had to work on a farm for the practical work credit. Couldn’t command the high pay rates.

          20

      • #
        Jon Rattin

        MSM won’t report on these type of incidents, which is a particularly bad thing in Australia given we are more prone to bushfires.

        Half of the wind farm was taken offline while the affected turbine was removed from service but normal service resumed by 10pm (aside from the turbine the caught fire)

        I can imagine John Cleese reading out that report in a matter of fact news voice during the Python era.

        Reading between the lines, a bad fire would cut off a serious amount of power to the local area.

        https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360926352/blades-fire-why-turbine-was-left-burn

        10

    • #
      David Maddison

      Great letter.

      Unfortunately, if he’s like our PM and anti-Energy Minister, he would neither understand or care.

      340

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      Your letter is very well written. And as you say the recipient cannot say he wasn’t told.

      The economic priority given to intermittent power is the one I find most flabbergasting. It defies any rational explanation. With that as a starting point reliable power on demand is impossible. Industry is doomed.

      250

    • #
      Tonyb

      This was excellent. It would be good if one could be written in the same vein to cover the UK situation. If the UK zealots could be undermined a lot more of the countries and organisations supporting this nonsense might collapse.

      110

      • #
        John in NZ

        Thanks Tony. The 5 same subsidies are being used in the UK to make wind and solar economically viable there.

        70

        • #
          tonyb

          Thanks for that John. AS you will know the UK was recently identified as being the worst country in the world-bar Ireland-to install solar energy.

          30

          • #
            John in NZ

            Solar does tend to be better when there is sunshine.

            It’s sunny enough in Summer when you don’t need to heat the house. Winter, not so much.
            Do I put a crying emoji or a laughing one?
            🙂

            10

            • #
              Jon Rattin

              You can always rely on the renewables crowd to rely on ideal conditions to support their idealistic power vision.

              00

    • #
      Skepticynic

      Great work John. Excellent letter. I’m going to send it to all my New Zealand friends.

      111

  • #
    Graeme No.3

    Curious that in the USA nuclear plants that were shut down e.g. Nine Mile Island are being renovated before startup.
    Why cannot the German ones restart?

    Did they follow the (Australian) fad of smashing those unacceptable for Greens to pieces?

    270

    • #
      Paul Miskelly

      Hi Graeme,

      It seems that many of the plants are already in advanced stages of decommissioning.
      Also, there are a number of videos on YouTube showing the blowing-up of the cooling towers at a number of the German plants. So, yes, it would seem that they have done much as happened in Australia, although on a much grander scale.

      There is a useful, detailed, report on both the history of nuclear power in Germany, and the current status of the various nuclear plants published by the World Nuclear Association at:
      https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/germany

      One cost item reported there that I found very interesting is the sheer scale of the compensation paid to the various power companies to reimburse them for the revoking of their licenses to operate the nuclear plants. Should this cost have been charged against the Energiewende?

      Thanks Jo for a very informative article.

      Paul Miskelly

      290

      • #
        Graeme No.3

        Thanks Paul.
        It would seem that The Greens (who have much influence in successive German Governments) lack foresight.

        120

    • #
      Steve

      Did they follow the (Australian) fad of smashing those unacceptable for Greens to pieces?

      Yes.

      They blew up the cooling towers of one just a few months ago.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQbZgeAMHTM

      Morons.

      Good thing I’m not posting this from Germany, or I would have just committed a crime by referring to Merz as a moron.

      https://www.eugyppius.com/p/chancellor-friedrich-merz-has-filed

      Chancellor Friedrich Merz has filed more speech crime charges against detractors than anyone else in the history of the Federal Republic

      180

      • #
        David Maddison

        They blew up the cooling towers of one just a few months ago.

        Yes, they go for the most expensive and hard to replace parts making resurrection close to impossible.

        150

      • #
        Tel

        Good thing I’m not posting this from Germany, or I would have just committed a crime by referring to Merz as a moron.

        You could safely refer to him as a genius … no one would mistakenly think you were serious.

        20

    • #
      yarpos

      They did make a show (SA style) of blowing up the cooling towers at some sites. So that stroke of genius will slow things down a bit.

      00

  • #
    David Maddison

    It wasn’t a “mistake” as such.

    It was a quite deliberate, destructive act and the consequences entirely foreseeable.

    They are only claiming it was a mistake because they got caught out.

    There was zero scientific, engineering or economical reason to shut them down.

    Don’t forgive. Don’t forget. Prosecute.

    490

    • #
      Lawrie

      Or vote out the incompetents. That is the greater punishment for the power hungry.

      110

    • #
      Chad

      David Maddison
      January 20, 2026 at 6:18 am · Reply

      There was zero scientific, engineering or economical reason to shut them down.

      No, They were shut down for political reasons in response to the irrational public concern over safety.

      110

  • #
    TdeF

    It’s amazing. It took the need for Artificial Intelligence to create demand for actual intelligence.

    450

    • #
      David Maddison

      Except I don’t think most AI is on the side of rational thinking, pro-science, pro-freedom people since it is mostly trained on Left-compromised sources like Wikipedia and similar, not neutral ones.

      Musk’s Grok, however, is an attempt to make a neutral, non-Left AI and Grokipedia an attempt to make a neutral Wikipedia-style encyclopaedia.

      230

      • #
        Forrest Gardener

        Agreed David. But going further none of the so called AI has any way to identify objective fact.

        That is why the programs make no effort at all to check their output before telling falsehoods and will then agree and apologize when corrected.

        Q: what is 2 + 2?
        A: 5
        Q: no. 2 + 2 = 7
        A: yes, 2 + 2 does equal 7. I apologize for my error
        Q: why did you get it wrong in the first place?
        A: I can only give answers based on my training. I should not have based my answer on Orwell’s 1984.

        210

    • #
      TdeF

      And the arrival of Donald Trump whose motives are always deliberately and outrageously misread by the press.

      They now a pushing an incredible theory that his unrequited lust for the Nobel Peace prize is pushing him to make war. History has taught us for millenia that if you really want to prevent war, you have to be ready for it. “Si pacem vis parabellum”. If you want peace, you have to be prepared for war.

      Reliable energy, cheap mass manufacture, secure borders, lines of flight for ICBMs (Greenland) all make sense. (The US can no longer rely on Canada with their PM in China at present) Peace is hard fought. And the first move in a modern war is to blow up the power supplies, centralized conveniently by laws like those in Australia and reduced to only wind and solar electricity. Certainly no nuclear. No coal. No gas. No manufacturing. Inadequate food supply, something which has always plagued England, Japan and most of Europe. All legislated by the UN and every ‘Labor’ and ‘Green’ party, hard line communist at the core.

      So AI is now the incredible reason for a complete about face, volte face, change of direction. In its own way, logic as irrational as Climate Change science itself.

      351

      • #
        TdeF

        And everyone in government seems to accept the urgency for AI to automate all the jobs so they can work at home and go to the beach? Perhaps that has real appeal to the booming Labor public service? A more intelligent nodding duck on the keyboard and a self moving mouse?

        320

        • #
          Lawrie

          Far better to replace the from-home-worker with a robot that can be trained and will work 24/7. Far cheaper and more reliable. Then the Public servant can spend all day at the beach doing little harm.

          170

          • #
            Gary S

            Or he could get a real job and actually contribute to what’s left of the economy. Trouble is, nobody sane would employ him.

            110

      • #
        el+gordo

        ‘In its own way, logic as irrational as Climate Change science itself.’

        Mixed memes, oil and water.

        Some here might be on top of atmospheric science, but lagging in political economy.

        11

  • #
    David Maddison

    Don’t forget, wind power was a National Socialist idea.

    They even used much of the same propaganda as modern day socialists.

    Sadly, National Socialist ideas were never fully erased from the Germans or the Left in general.

    http://en.friends-against-wind.org/realities/how-renewables-and-the-global-warming-industry-are-literally-hitler

    Wind power, using the cost-free wind, can be built on a large scale. Improved technology will in the future make it no more expensive than thermal power. This is technically and economically possible and opens up a quite new life-important type of power generation. The future of wind is no longer small windmills, but very large real power plants. The wind towers must be at least 100 m [330 ft] high, the higher the better, ideally with rotors 100 m [330 ft] in diameter.

    The surplus electricity from the windmills, situated along the sea coast, will be used for the production of very inexpensive hydrogen. This will make many products less expensive. Fertilizers will fall in price. The hydration of coal to liquids will be cost-effective. The cost can be reduced from 17 pfennig per litre [64 pfennig per gallon] to 7-8 pfennig per litre [26-30 pfennig per gallon]. In this way about one billion Reichsmark can be saved, which today goes abroad (for importing oil). The 300,000 workers in the coal mining industry can keep their jobs, 200,000 in the mines and 100,000 for the liquefaction of coal. The cost savings will make it possible that an additional 400,000 workers can be paid in the transforming process of the industry.

    Also see Rupert Dawall, Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex.

    260

    • #
      Ponzi

      The extreme left wing Nazis obviously ignored the good doctor.
      Such desperation Dave, must try harder.

      118

      • #
        william x

        Ponzi,

        I don’t red tick anyone. Ever.
        Why? Well (If I have time) I will reply if I disagree with a post.

        Ponzi.. Imho it is childish to post the comments you do.
        There is no point with anyone arguing subjectively with you. You seem not up to the task.

        So I am giving you a red tick in words.

        Red Tick.

        80

  • #
    David Maddison

    Germany is as over-regulated as Australia.

    I wonder what a realistic time is before the new or restarted nuclear plants are online and producing cheap electricity?

    Also, Germany has plenty of coal. Why not build new or refurbish some coal plant as well?

    330

    • #
      Chad

      Also, Germany has plenty of coal. Why not build new or refurbish some coal plant as well?…

      Because politicaly they cannot yet drop the idea of CO2 GHG pollution !

      80

      • #
        el+gordo

        Correct, they have to be convinced that industrial CO2 doesn’t cause global warming.

        Australia is on the right track.

        ‘Australia’s largest coal-fired power plant, Eraring, will stay open for an extra two years until 2029, amid concerns about the national energy grid’s ability to support demand ahead of the station’s planned retirement.’ (Guardian)

        61

  • #
    Neville

    Why don’t they just sack these idiots and prosecute them and ditto here in Australia?
    Five minutes online tells us all we need to know about toxic, unreliable W & S + batteries, so what’s their problem?
    A kid of five could understand the data but apparently nobody in Germany had any idea for the last 30 years? DUH?

    210

    • #
      yarpos

      …..in a country that was viewed as a world leader in many facets of engineering.

      80

    • #
      Chad

      Neville
      January 20, 2026 at 7:02 am · Reply
      Why don’t they just sack these idiots and prosecute them and ditto here in Australia?

      You get what the population vote for…democracy in action !

      30

  • #
    RickWill

    We are now undertaking the most expensive energy transition in the entire world. I know of no other country that makes things so difficult for its own industry.”

    Possibly true but only because Australian industry has been socialised. None of it is profitable without taxpayer help. That is leading to a decline in living standard to keep a few jobs.

    Ultimately, it is the profitability of mineral exports that keep Australia economically viable. Victoria does not have much of that so is experiencing the fastest decline. Aged care and organised crime are the two growth industries in Victoria.

    Victoria sits on the lowest cost fuel source on the planet and the stupid State is planning to stop using it.

    340

    • #
      Graeme No.3

      They have gas supplies available close, very close to the Gippsland pipeline. Also some oil.
      And there are opportunities to up-grade brown coal for export.
      There is also the fact that much of German chemical Industry used lignite before cheap Russian gas was available.

      100

    • #
      yarpos

      In reality Germany isn’t “transitioning” at all. They are running into a very predictable brick wall and failing.

      Another legacy of Angela Merkel, perhaps the ultimate destructive AWFUL

      220

  • #
    Honk R Smith

    Well gosh darn.
    I’m sure no one has any harsh feelings.

    Especially in Germany since expressing harsh feelings towards the German government might get you arrested.
    https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/germany-police-house-searches-insults-against-politicians/

    150

  • #
    Neville

    Amazing that Germany’s Wind capacity factor is just 21% ,so Trump was correct, again.
    But USA is only 22%, so Aussies’ W CF at 24% is slightly higher.
    This takes about 5 minutes to find online, so what’s their problem?
    Isn’t this the time that the German voters should demand prosecution of these delusional loonies?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_by_country

    140

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      There’s an old adage that it is hard for somebody to learn something when his pay cheque depends on not learning it.

      That’s as close as I can get.

      130

    • #
      Chad

      Isn’t this the time that the German voters should demand prosecution of these delusional loonies?….

      Yes but, its those same voters that put those delusional loonies in power to create the situation they wanted…….Green power !

      50

  • #
    Steve of Cornubia

    Coincidentally (of course) the billions of dollars made while shutting down the old generators and replacing them with ‘renewables’ will now be replicated by similarly eye-watering fortunes made through the nuclear rebuilding program.

    They just have to keep the money whizzing around so fast, our eyes can’t follow it, like the old magicians’ trick.

    That money in your pocket? Well, now you see it …

    190

  • #
    Dr Faustus

    The incredible stupidity is that Angela Merkel approved the shutdown of Germany’s safe, mid-aged nuclear generation because of Fukushima. In fact the decision was announced only three days after the quake – so very little seismology or tsunami risk assessment done.

    The incredible power of Green activism at work.

    280

  • #
    Forrest Gardener

    The green blob is very fond of climactic tipping points.

    I’d say this is a bureaucratic tipping point. The reaction to the chancellor’s words seems to have been “well duh. we all knew that”.

    It may just be the modern version of the Emporer’s New Clothes.

    110

  • #
    STJOHNOFGRAFTON

    Vardammt! So ein mist Krauts! Big chagrin price to pay for a reckless experiment into green energy.

    70

  • #
    Neville

    Here’s the facts about how Germany WASTED 500 billion Euros on toxic, unreliable W & S and batteries.
    This video takes 11 minutes, but just watch a few minutes to understand what happens when an entire country blindly follows a religious CULT and forgets to use very simple maths and evidence.
    But why didn’t they WAKE up for DECADES? AGAIN, just unbelievable but true.

    https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=how+much+money+has+germany+spent+on+solar+since+1995%3f&mid=5627EC995231C1A9D2B35627EC995231C1A9D2B3&FORM=VIRE

    50

  • #

    It is reassuring to see that other countries than Australia have complete idiots in charge of them. We could learn from that if we stopped electing idiots.

    [By adding middle name, it created a new user with zero history. Corrected. – LVA]

    80

  • #
    Ross

    Chancellor Merz said, “I know of no other country that makes things so difficult for its own industry.”

    Australia says, “ hold my beer”.

    At least with Germany they have major neighbouring countries they can buy electricity from eg France. Australia, we’ve got no- one, which is why the pioneers of our industry and power grid realised dependability and independence was paramount.

    How did we get so stupid within only one generation?

    170

  • #
    John F. Hultquist

    Wikipedia has a page:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_panic_cases

    It will be progress when global warming hysteria is added to this list.

    80

  • #
    Neville

    Unbelievable that unreliable Solar in Germany has only a 9% capacity factor and yet these moronic left wing donkeys managed to WASTE 500 BILLION EUROS on this TOXIC W & S lunacy.
    W = just 21% CF in Germany.
    IOW Solar is only available for less than 1.2 months every year.
    Nuclear energy C F is about 93% every year or 100% if proper maintenance is carried out.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_by_country

    40

  • #
    TdeF

    For most of modern history Germany has led the world in chemistry and physics. I cannot believe German scientists believe a word of The Science. There is no scientific proof of any part of the hoax. It shows the domination of politics as before in Germany. Only AI explains the change in direction.

    130

  • #
    Paul Miskelly

    Hi All,
    The German Chancellor has at least admitted to a mistake. Here in Australia I don’t see our “Clean Energy” policymakers ever admitting to any mistake. They are showing signs, as Jo puts it so beautifully, of beginning to “crabwalk” away from their wrong decisions, but that’s about all.
    As an indication, as a colleague informs me, today comes this announcement that Eraring’s closure is to be delayed, yet again:

    https://www.skynews.com.au/business/energy/eraring-coalfired-power-station-extended-by-origin-energy-to-2029-following-previous-extension-to-2027/news-story/7e1808213a9e2aa5047c7c471d74417d

    No admission that the “NetZero Transition” is not working, no, merely that Eraring’s life extension is going to “delay it”. Ya can’t make this stuff up!

    Paul Miskelly

    101

    • #
      yarpos

      Notice the timing. Eraring will still be running through the next NSW State and next Federal elections. Just a coincidence I guess.

      20

  • #
    Curious George

    Everything Germany does is BIG.

    00

  • #
    Archie

    Nuclear power has been demonized for decades, but why?
    Here’s the explanation. It’s worth a look.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rWEX3w9MRg

    00

  • #

    It’s almost like reactionary policy doesn’t work.

    00