Recent Posts


Bafflement?! Germany, a global leader in renewables but has one of the highest EU electricity prices

Kühltürme AKW in Phillipsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany By Fischer.H

By Jo Nova

If renewables are expensive, it’s volatile coal’s fault!

How can it be? Germany has all that free wind and solar power but the price of electricity is the second highest in Europe.

Apparently a nation with 45% of its generation from wind and solar is still “tied to volatile fossil fuel”. This is like a hostage situation, it’s so cruel?!

EuroNews is spinning a fairy tale at 100 miles an hour.

Germany is a leader in renewables, so why does it have one of the highest EU electricity prices?

Germany generated more electricity from solar and wind in 2025 than any other EU country – but its prices remain tied to volatile fossil fuels.

German households pay around a third more for electricity than the EU average, despite the country’s impressive efforts to ditch fossil fuels.

According to energy think tank Ember, Germany is one of the “global leaders” for wind and solar energy deployment, with 59 per cent of its electricity coming from clean sources in 2025.

Since the introduction of its landmark renewable energy law (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz) in 2000, the country’s share of generation from wind and solar alone has skyrocketed from less than two per cent to almost 45 per cent last year.

At the same time, coal – which is often described as the ‘dirtiest’ form of energy – fell from supplying more than half of Germany’s electricity to just 21 per cent.

Using Eurostat data on electricity prices for the second half of 2025, 1KOMMA5° calculates that the EU average comes out at €0.29 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) including taxes and levies – but in Germany, households pay an average of €0.39/kWh.

The stark truth: The system costs are awful

A wind and solar grid is really two grids for the price of … two grids. One grid helps impress your shallow academic friends at dinner, while the other grid (the reliable one) could run all the time, but has to sit around waiting for the first grid to fail, which it does often, and then it swings in to gear to save the day. Neither grid is running efficiently, the unreliable one forces the reliable one to stop and start. So we get the worst of all worlds and a big electricity bill.

Wind and solar power are only cheap if you don’t mind blackouts or shutting down factories and destroying your manufacturing base (BASF, Volkswagon, anyone?)

 

EuroNews delivers the bad news: €500 a family wasted on a weather shifting project

For a typical single household (consuming 1,500 kWh), Germany’s high electricity prices mean households will be paying around €150 per year compared to the EU average – or an additional €500 for a family with a 5,000 kWh electricity consumption.

 The one thing wind and solar can’t buy — Flexibility

Why does Germany waste clean energy?

But as Jannik Schall, co-founder of 1KOMMA5°, points out: “Germany does not have too much cheap wind and solar power, but too little flexibility in the system.”

Last year, Germany spent €435 billion euros on renewable energy curtailment. This involves intentionally shutting down electricity production in areas of oversupply and ramping up supply elsewhere.

System costs get you every time

Unreliable generators need a massive oversupply of generation, frequency stability, transmission lines, back up batteries, new market arraignments, payments for curtailment of the oversupply of generators, and then you have to throw away all the generators after 20 to 25 years, bury them in a big hole and start again.

Crazy people thought two grids would be cheaper than one?

 

 

10 out of 10 based on 45 ratings

25 comments to Bafflement?! Germany, a global leader in renewables but has one of the highest EU electricity prices

  • #
    Ronin

    If wind and sun are free (the sun doesn’t send a bill), why then isn’t our power free.

    170

    • #
      Dennis

      It’s similar to owning a yacht, the wind is free but the equipment required to utilise the wind is expensive

      160

      • #
        Jon Rattin

        True. Most sailboats nowadays have an auxiliary engine for back up. What do renewables have for back up apart from batteries with short term capacity? Oh, that would be base load power or diesel…we are transitioning away from common sense.

        40

    • #
      RickWill

      Be careful what you wish for. Australia’s Capacity Investment Scheme is heading toward guaranteed return on estimated cost of projects. The proponents get their return on capital without even producing anything. That is how the transmission and distribution networks are funded already but generation and storage are heading the same way.

      With this sort of financing, the actual generation does not matter so energy can be supplied free because the money spent is already guaranteed a return irrespective of output. Any return on energy sold is a bonus.

      You will already be seeing the impact of this as cost of energy is stable or even falling but the service fee is on steroids.

      180

      • #
        ianl

        … the service fee is on steroids

        Yes. It’s the cost of transporting electrons to the cities from windmills in the Strzelecki Desert.

        A quite recent social conversation with a now-retired neurologist, who of course is extremely sharp on most topics, showed me that most people (including the highly educated ones) do not know or recognise the impossibly expensive duality of the power grid as it has now lobbed up – and do not wish to know.

        Any comment, even the mildest, to demonstrate the issue is regarded as “anti-science” and wilfully disregarding 99% of climate scientists.

        ON is an electoral cattle prod, throttled back with real malice by the MSM.

        80

  • #
    Richard Ilfeld

    The Germans have a reputation for being stubborn. They are likely to keep working at this wind and solar thing, now that they are committed to it,
    in that same way they keep the engine in the trunk of the Beetle for 60 years. But their economy has changed considerably. If they decided today
    they wanted to be a manufacturing superpower again, I doubt they could manage without abundant, low cost energy, another choice they could make.
    But the energy choice they’ve made seems to preclude the foundries and forges, and giant machines at the bottom of the manufacturing pyramid,
    In reality they are having a problem keeping their car plants open and competitive. Unlike many countries, their past frugality gives them a balance sheet
    that is buying them some time, but decisions must be made. And without the economic beating heart of Germany, wither Brussels?
    The US has reversed a lot of its energy (and economy) stupidity, and although we are drowning in dept we are also fully employed, moderately self-sufficient,
    able to export both food and fuel, and growing such that a way out of debt is at least imaginable. For a place like Australia, if your attitudes changed it’s
    pretty easy to imagine a small population with the resources of a continent trading with a world that is short on many thing can be as prosperous as they wish to be.
    II fear for Europe, with obvious dysfunction, both in Brussels and in the various capitals; double the opportunity to mess things up and a vast number of little
    fiefdoms desperate to protect what they have. Perhaps grid failure in, say, communist Spain, will sharpen people’s minds. Or perhaps, like socialism, there will
    be a new crop of zealots to flog climate fear driving stupid policy no matter how many times it failed.

    170

  • #
    Neville

    The data is very clear that we must use very safe and reliable BASELOAD energy like Coal, Gas, Nuclear or Hydro and never invest in unreliable rubbish like toxic W & S.
    Just follow proper data and evidence and don’t allow clueless, unreliable W & S to destroy your environments for a zero return on the so called investment.
    IOW why continue to waste endless billions of $ for nothing but misery and a much lower standard of living for future generations.

    90

    • #
      RickWill

      There is hope. As a voting block, the millennials favor One Nation over the other options. These started formal education when the climate propaganda was already embedded in primary school teaching so these kids have spent their entire formative life being bombarded with scary stories of thermageddon unless humanity stops burning fossil fuels. Many now know they have been lied to their entire life and are revolting.

      160

  • #
    Greg in NZ

    Pfft! Germany a global leader with 59% so-called clean power generation? Up from 2% 26 years ago? Minnows! Mere beginners learning to walk [stumble, then fall?].

    Little old New Zealand with less than 6 million souls – equivalent to a small town in China – has been running on approx. 85% natural generation since the first hydro dam was built in the late 1800s. As a disgraced ex-PM used to blather, WE are ‘world leaders’ in saving the planet – or was it saving the children? Her reign seems like a bad nightmare now, better left to fade into oblivion [or the fires of hell].

    And thanks to our conscientious old-school engineers using concrete & steel & bulldozers & diesel trucks to build a series of dams, hence providing renewable energy, we’re doing our bit to keep the planet cool [read: cold!] with today’s 1st of July 7-below-freezing black ice closing highways down south and causing numerous crashes for early morning commuters in Dunedin and other parts of Otago / Queenstown.

    Nope, absolutely NO globular wobbly warming happening down here to speak of, and with no wind anywhere this week, all those monumental bird-chopping prayer wheels are sitting idle… whose loopy idea was this anyway?

    110

  • #
    Neville

    Here’s the complete GLOBAL energy mix from 1988 to 2024 and note the huge increase in FFs since this W & S lunacy started in 1988 or 2000 etc.
    W & S is that tiny toxic sliver at the top and the graph is active so you can highlight any of the mix with your mouse.
    So when will our stupid donkeys start to wake up?

    https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-energy-substitution

    50

  • #
    nb

    A summary of the EU:
    I shot myself in the foot. It’s not fair I’m limping. (It’s all your fault.)

    80

  • #
    Jaye Patrick

    How does the German energy grid cope during wind droughts and solar panels covered with snow?

    70

    • #
      Neville

      Not very well Jaye. That’s why you need to pay for two systems, instead of one very reliable baseload system that lasts beyond 2100.

      80

  • #
    Ross

    Stupid eh? Net Zero is bad enough, but mix that with wacky EU politics and it’s a famine of common sense. This is probably the perfect example of that absurdity. German politics mixed with Climate zealotry. We in Australia sometime see this stupidity up front. There’s a bunch of Aussie canola farmers about to sign contracts to supply canola into the EU. But the paperwork is horrendous.

    This is what has to be provided to get a contract- Council rates, fuel invoices, chem invoices, lime and gypsum invoices, drummuster receipt, bio security plan, pollinator protection plan, environmental protection plan, green house gas pollution plan, proof of oil recycling, employee contracts, lease and share farming agreements, contractor invoices, crop rotations, soil testing records, weight notes , grain contracts, workshop organisation and compliance, spray diary records just to start! All this to ensure imports to the EU are clean and green.

    Once all this is supplied and contract confirmed, guess where the canola is used?

    Majority into biodiesel, where it’s combusted almost immediately.

    60

  • #
    Johnny Rotten

    System Costs get you every time.

    Read that again Blackout Bowen and let that sink in if it can into your Thick Head.

    50

  • #
    Angus McLennan

    I drove to the VW factory north of Berlin in 2002, there where wind farms as far as the eye could see about 1 in ten not working. My passenger was a multi millionaire from investing in part of these wind farms. They have been a total failure, every Australian member of parliament should go and witness. VW is on the verge of bankruptcy due to high electricity costs plus a failed entry into economic vandalism (non ice cars)

    60

  • #
    TdeF

    They talk about the cost per family.

    Given Snowy II alone with its entire transmission line and borrowed moneys will cost $1.2Trillion, 1.2 million million, the cost per person in Australia will be $46,000. Per family perhaps $200,000.

    Renewables and endless mad projects, ‘big builds’ are churning up more billions. Australia is already $2.2Trillion debt, so $400,000 per family. For what?

    And they talk of wind being required with the ‘retirement’ of coal. So one of the most coal rich countries in the world is not allowed use FREE coal.

    Mad men are in charge. Or villains. or China.

    60

    • #
      TdeF

      And the benefit of all this Australian war on Australian CO2 is what exactly?

      And just electricity is only 1/3 of our energy needs. How do we reach zero fossil fuel CO2 in Australia without shutting down mining, chemical manufacture including fertilizer, explosive manufacture, smelting, trucking, transport, glass making, flying, sailing, export? Gas alone is a major chemical source. And we really need CO2 for preservation, medicine and more.

      Passing laws to minimize use of the sixth member of the periodic table is science gone nuts. Perhaps H2O is next? After all fossil fuel releases H2O into the atmosphere and we will all drown as seas rise or boil as humidity keeps going up.

      In Australia I blame the CSIRO, Chief Scientist and every university science and engineering staff member who does not call out this incredible hoax. I do not really blame the ones who do not know what carbon is other than black. The people who do not know they breathe out CO2 like every living thing. Or that they are made entirely from CO2.

      20

  • #
    John F. Hultquist

    I looked at the chart. I’m right there with Hungary. 🙂

    30

    • #

      Here’s the current cost per unit of electricity for all States in the US.

      For comparison’s sake, multiply the figure you see there by 1.45 to convert to Australian costs.

      As a checking ‘thing’, and used to remember previous addresses, I have kept the last electricity bill from each residence I have lived in, and since 2010 there’s only been three moves.

      That earliest power bill dates from August 2010, from Coomera on The Gold Coast, and I now live at Beenleigh, just 25Km up the M1.

      On that 2010 power bill, I was paying 17 cents per KWH, and I’m now paying 29 cents per KWH

      However, of note here, and the ‘cunning’ way they have increased electricity costs over the years, you know, and kept those increases, well, sort of reasonable, have a look at this little kicker.

      The supply charge, the cost PER DAY to supply your home with electricity.

      Back in 2010, that cost was 11 cents PER DAY.

      It’s now $1.13 per day.

      So while it cost $9.90 per 90 day bill cycle in 2010. that cost is now $101.70. So, an extra $100 across that time, or $400 per year.

      See how they’ve increased the cost of electricity, you know, when all people ‘really’ see is the ….. total – how much do we have to pay them?

      Tony.

      30

    • #
      Steve

      I’d love to see that electricity prices chart overlaid with a second chart of the percentage of renewables on the grid. I suspect the results would be quite similar, with all the most expensive countries also having the most renewables.

      00

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>