Image by MythologyArt from Pixabay
By Jo Nova
China wants to rule the world
And so the media circus continues. China’s new five year plans are out, and no matter what they are, the media has to pretend China is a good little carbon player like everyone else. No one can admit the truth, that China’s emissions are so big everyone else is irrelevant. That China breaks all the rules while cornering the market selling junk wind-and-solar-generators to an audience that doesn’t need them.
To say so would destroy the illusion — like turning up to a party with a carton of antimatter.
And now China wants to govern the vassal states (like Australia) presumably to make sure they continue to be forced to buy the junk generators, so they can’t compete with China in making real things.
Climate change is a racket that serves China and the UN.
[Bloomberg] China aims to “actively participate in and lead global climate governance,” according to a draft of the country’s 2026-2030 five-year plan published Thursday.
-
-
- Nation will “uphold the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities” and “fully implement the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement”
- NOTE: China’s backing comes after the US withdrew from the Paris accord for a second time, and exited a raft of UN bodies focused on climate action
-
While the developed world have been sabotaging their own economies, China’s carbon emissions have lifted off with a rocket. In their last five year plan they promised only to reduce carbon intensity, which is not the same as “carbon emissions”. Carbon intensity measures how much carbon dioxide they produce per unit of GDP. So they can reduce intensity, while they burn more coal than ever, (which they are) as long as the economy is growing even faster than their coal burning. (Which it is). Thus and verily they are putting out more CO2 but making more fridges for the world for the same bucketload of emissions.
If we believe the UN propaganda “carbon intensity” doesn’t heat the planet, only carbon emission do*, but no one cares that China uses an accounting trick to pretend it is “doing something”.
In the last five year plan China promised to reduce its carbon “intensity” by 18 percent, but only succeeded in reducing it by 12%. In the next five years they are only going to aim for a 17% reduction. and they have given up even saying they are planning to phase out coal power.
So how does Reuters report this?
“China unveils plan to decarbonise economy but stops short of quitting coal”
This is what China’s emissions look like (below). I can’t see a whole lot of stopping short of quitting coal in that graph?
Bloomberg meanwhile says: “China Is Staying Cautious on Its Path to Hit Peak Emissions“. It’s a headline that hits the right Climate Bingo keywords but says almost nothing, other than China is still increasing its emissions.
“We will actively yet prudently work toward peaking carbon emissions and achieving carbon neutrality,” Premier Li Qiang said.
What he didn’t say was that they might not “achieve carbon neutrality” for a thousand years. But who cares, right? Not the Greens, that’s for sure.
Yesterday you were congratulating the USA for removing its emissions targets. Today, you are criticising China for reducing theirs.
CO2 emissions per capita is a far fairer comparison: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita
067
Nobody is criticizing China for reducing their emissions targets.
We are criticizing the media for their laughable portrayal of China as a net zero hero.
China is doing what every nation should do … building out their grid to provide energy to their population and businesses as quickly and cheaply as possible. And fossil fuels are still the best way to do that. Building out intermittent renewables before your baseload grid is built out is foolish. China is many things, but they aren’t foolish.
660
‘ … you are criticising China for reducing theirs.’
Beijing talks with a fork tongue, words are cheap.
171
China is still building new coal fired power plants while the rest of the world are closing theirs.
My position is: global boiling is the biggest scam ever perpetrated on humanity. It is affecting the West. China and Russia and the ME, the traditional enemies of the West are not letting global boiling affect their energy policies. China and Russia finance green idiots and quislings in the West to agitate to destroy the West’s energy security.
340
So you believe that carbon dioxide is a threat and emissions per capita is a reasonable measure. Surely it is all about the totals. So as far as you are concerned, you seriously believe that China’s annual 12.2 billion tonnes of CO2 is better for the planet than the 4.8 billion tonnes emitted by America? Duh!!!
160
So if you want to focus on emissions per capita, then there many small Pacific islands that would deserve severe censure, as their per capita figures are far higher than China. Naturally that would be ridiculous, as is any focus on emissions per capita.
140
Thanks again Jo for linking to OWI Data to prove that China is doing SFA about co2 emissions.
I just wish we were also using BASE-LOAD energy and not trying to destroy thousands of klms of our east Aussie environment.
Never forget we’ll have to replace that toxic, unreliable W & S rubbish every 15 to 20 years or many times before we reach 2100.
Unfortunately we forget that real base-load energy security ensures we have national security.
Amazing that China has understood about base-load energy security over 30 years ago.
320
You cannot see exponential growth in CO2 output from the world’s two biggest countries, India and China and then look at the graph of CO2 and still argue that emissions cause growth in CO2. The whole NET ZERO absurdity is based on an idea which is blatantly wrong.
381
The legislated massive hidden CO2 taxes in Australia are designed to destroy Australia. And legislators have moved away from jacking up electricity prices to just adding CO2 taxes to everything. Because everything we do is based on CO2. Start with breathing. We even have taxes now on cow farts.
And potential poisons now added to cattle feedstock to reduce methane in cow farts. Who thought this was a good idea? (“Studies have indicated that 3-NOP (Bovaer) is safe for cows and does not transfer into milk or meat, as it is fully metabolized in the gut. )
Coles Supermarkets: As of 2023, Coles has expanded its use of Bovaer, a feed supplement scientifically shown to reduce methane emissions from cattle by over 50%. This is used within their Coles Finest Carbon Neutral Beef range, which is certified by the Australian Government’s Climate Active Carbon Neutral Standard. The products are available nationally.
And while we are paying for this, at least we have ‘independent studies’ which indicate that feeding cows unnaturally on seaweed extract is perfectly safe. I seem to remember Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) had the same defence. Good old independent studies. And all fundamentally based on crap Climate Change.
380
Part of the penalising of coal fired power stations here is the emissions levy, legislation from 2016 Turnbull Government and could be extended to other emissions sources without new legislation.
120
For the past 50 years or so, we’ve been fed the dietary equivalent of a conspiracy thriller: “This magnificent grass-powered alchemist(cow)is actually trying to murder us with heart attacks!” Oh, and bonus plot twist—it’s also single-handedly cooking the planet with its burps and farts.
How on earth did we arrive at the point where the animal that turns grass into steak gets cast as the villain in both our health manuals and by climate alarmists.
320
“How on earth did we arrive at the point where the animal that turns grass into steak gets cast as the villain in both our health manuals and by climate alarmists.”
It’s been a long term plan that the cows have had for approximately 10500 years. As a way to get back at humanity for being domesticated without their permission.
It’s a generational hurt that the cows have felt so, the plan. Provide food and shelter to these pesky humans for millennia, then when their numbers build up to the billions, wipe all human life off the planet.
190
Cow with guns !!!!
90
🎶 We will fight for bovine freedom
And hold our large heads high
We will run free with the buffalo or die
Cows with guns 🎶
80
Cows were more than happy to sign up for domestication.
Food on tap so to speak, and a nice secure African box thorn kraal.
Cows felt that their interests were better served away from jackals.
And they had had enough of the lions with their airs of superiority.
But cows do feel that living on top of piles of manure, with the stench of the nearby manure lagoon falls someway short of the sort of appreciation that is expected in these circumstances.
And the feed quality is not what it once was.
So countries with free-range grazing opportunities, and an absence of predators are high on cows’ lists of destinations to consider for emigration.
120
Has anyone asked why thet particular phamaceutical has that effect?
Gas anyone asked WHY cattle, AND all other ruminants, domestic or “wild”.
The methane is a by-product of the bovine gut processing cellulose in the grasses that form the bulk of their diet.
If that drug slows or shuts down this gut chemistry, what effect might that have on the nett nutrients available to the cattle.
And, what might be the inevitable consequences.
Most of Australia has VERY crappy soils; probably because the place is, by FAR,the oldest Continent.
In many places Zinc is virtually um-measurable. Low Zinc adversely affects all plants, but particularly leafy vegetables like cabbage and lettuce. “Yellowing” leaves is one symptom.
Zinc is essential for the body’s production of Vitamin D. Vitamin D is essential for bone growth and maintenance. The other essential for vitamin D production is, oddly enough; Cosmic Radiation, i.e., slightly filtered SUNLIGHT. Hormesis.
The rising trend of rising Osteoporosis fits in there somewhere. How many bed-ridden “wrinklies” get wheeled out to the nursing-home courtyard for a couple of hours of good-old fresh air and SUNSHINE? AVERY organism on the planet had some sort of ancestral time in the primordial soup, being steadily bathed in all manner of interesting radiation.
Plenty of Zinc in Oz; the problem is that most of it is in oxides, hundreds of metres below the surface. Mt. Isa, anyone?
Most of Oz is WORN OUT, with only the tiny total areas of “volcanic” red and black soils being worked pretty hard for good returns.
10
China = Emissions Impossible
India = Emissions Impossible
The West = Nut Zero
200
China spends a LOT of money on politicians. In other countries. And none of them want it to stop.
210
Just look at how many of “our” politicians have “consultancies” or “business interests” with China, before, during or after politics.
200
Belt & Road example of investing and like criminal gangs standing over recipients demanding repayment or penalty like handing over land.
121
So why do our so called scientists, MSM and most clueless pollies etc lie to us about their so called dangerous climate change emergency?
And why does the data easily prove we are now living in the safest period in Human history?
For 99.9% of the last 300,000 years Human life expectancy was just 28.5 years and yet has now soared to 73.5% years in 2026.
Global death rates from all extreme weather events have fallen by 98% in the last 100 years, so what’s their problem?
Population in the 1920s was just 2 billion and 6.2 billion more people at risk today, so again, what’s their problem?
190
The propaganda spreaders are just about everywhere and Local Government Councils is a good example. During the late 2019 bushfire period (season) in NSW there were major bushfires around the Mid North Coast and of course elsewhere, the Council Deputy Mayor spread the word that climate emergency was responsible for the bushfires and I emailed the Mayor and the Deputy to complain including pointing out the long drought period underway and very dry conditions prevailing, and I asked about fuel reduction burning and clearing after a volunteer fire fighter told me about how reluctant Council is to approve Rural Fire Service requests to burn.
I also mentioned “traditional indigenous season burning” culture, subject to prevailing winds and conditions burning in a patchwork pattern each segment at different times and years and cool fires resulting burning out when they reached a previously burnt segment alongside. The Mayor agreed with my comments and replied about seasonal burning that only recently local elders had discussed it with him. The Deputy replied angrily and in denial and argued that climate change science is settled, etc.
240
‘Bushfire season’ was previously referred to as ‘Summer’. Perhaps it’s now included with the many indigenous seasons.
140
And contrary to Opposition Leader Albanese and comrades 2019 allegations against PM Morrison bushfires and other natural disasters are States responsibility, State Emergency Services and State Ministers and budget based funding.
Also, when a leader is absent on leave the deputy takes over the responsibilities temporarily.
120
The leader missing in action during the 2019 bushfires was Palachook, who was off on a cruise while Queensland had major fires going on – fires that were already underway when she boarded the cruise ship.
But because she was a Labor Premier their was SFA criticism of her absence.
100
“traditional indigenous season burning”
I suspect that this “deep knowledge” about how burns were well thought out and planned has also suffered from “noble savage” syndrome. Watkin Tench noted in his diary on arriving at Botany Bay in JANUARY, one of the hottest driest times, that the natives lit fires with abandon, without regard of any possible impact on tribes down wind. Sure light enough fires often enough over great areas and the chances of huge wildfire must be reduced. The great advantage that the natives had with traditional burning was there were no green groups or government permits to apply for.
260
No infrastructure to damage either.
140
The great disadvantage, for the environment, was that they had no way to extinguish fires once lit. So in burning until they were naturally extinguished, the fires permanently altered the ecological balance. Some must have been enormously extensive in area and duration.
120
In 500 odd languages and dialects this is called caring for the environment, in green new speak this is called environmental vandalism, in practical experience speak its called altering the environment for advantage. There are other definitions depending on what individuals want or believe.
90
Yep, the entire areas of the Murray-Darling Basin out of the mountains in the east and south east, all the way across through Channel Country to about Alice Springs was once forested, mainly acacias, until the Aborigines spent a couple of thousand years persistently burning it off.
There is a carbon layer in the soil right across that range from around 8-10,000 years ago, and below that the soil shows concentration of seeds, etc., from trees that aren’t as fire tolerant as eucalypts.
80
From my research seasonal burning was developed and applied for ONLY about 7,000 years of indigenous settlement here, and did not apply to difficult terrain areas because their objectives were open country with stands of trees and grass areas to attract food supplies, to camp and to move about more easily.
Maybe first settlers did not realise the patchwork quilt pattern system and mistook all fires as indiscriminate burning? The seasonal means weather permitting, prevailing winds favourable for direction of cool fire to another earlier burnt patch.
I have visited many art galleries and museums during retirement travels around Australia and the early pioneer paintings and drawings do describe the “estate-like” landscape of grass and trees, the collection in Newcastle NSW and Hobart Tasmania of particular interest.
I have no doubt that seasonal burning did at times get out of control, change of wind direction for example
100
China has no intention of destroying its own economy with Net Zero as the West and especially Australia, which is fanatically committed to the idea – more so than most, are doing (except the United States under TRUMP).
When our politicians and the senior public serpents who tell them what to think persist in a course of action which is definitely bringing about the economic destruction of Australia for no demonstrable benefit whatsoever, and despite them being repeatedly told this and them ignoring such advice PROSECUTIONS must be initiated.
You may wish to remind politicians of this whenever you meet them.
160
David, who are the good guys going to prosecute?
You will not get the courts to convict a politician for poor government. The settled law is that poor government is not justiciable. You will have to get them for corruption or similar.
The same goes for the public serpents. They can create the worst nation destroying advice imaginable and implement it incompetently as only public serpents can. That too is not justiciable. You need to get them for corruption or similar.
And who is going to prosecute? Not your common and garden police force or director of public prosecutions. It would be attorneys general who are of course politicians.
Not going to happen. We are better off working elsewhere against the future interests of those who climb the greasy pole so that there is no soft landing on the way down.
140
It would be difficult but there is a common law tort of misfeasance in public office.
It would be difficult, but one day Australia might get a rational government.
They can’t claim they were “acting on best available advice” because there is a preponderance of evidence that they weren’t. They were acting with “reckless indifference”.
The harm being done to Australia by Net Zero is so extreme, extraordinary legal measures are required to punish its promoters.
191
Honestly David. These are not the droids you are looking for.
Bringing the wrong case would result in dismissal of the claim and an emboldened political class.
The response would be along the lines of you don’t get me I’m part of the union.
30
“action done with reckless indifference” should have been applied to Dudd and several of his Ministers in regards to the deaths caused by shonky operators during the great roof insulation roll out debacle.
They were told, in as many words, what would be the result, but they went ahead regardless of the warnings.
People died, predictably.
20
Forest,
Yes, I started the court cases that led to our High Court claiming that poor government is non-justicible. It was a peculiar diversion from reality when the HC seized on a minor topic of whether a colleague had the right not to disclose the correct location of a uranium prospect we had discovered, for fear that it would be taken from us. (It was taken, without compensation).
It was a key moment in my own life to realise that our High Court sought to evade the obvious in order to please the then government. Geoff S
270
It has been and continues to be in the best interests of China/CCP nation building and wealth creation of course
70
Starting point 1975 UN Lima Agreement effectively to transfer the wealth of developed nations to developing nations, example transferring know how and manufacturing industry to take advantage of considerably cheaper operating costs and the free trade agreements system with developed nations removing import barriers (import duties and others), as Australia did during the 1980s following a series of government and business delegates meeting for discussions and proposals, some large union dominated workplace companies were for a while permitted to retain import duty, motor industry and textiles for example.
Next stages included UN Agenda 21, now Agenda 30 – Sustainability and then Kyoto Climate Conference and emissions reduction targets, another imposition of regulations and compliance costs for businesses and wider communities. Followed up with Paris Agreement and Glasgow, Copenhagen earlier failed to achieve the UN goals for additional penalties and emissions trading schemes, etc.
Australia after Kyoto 1997 Howard Government introduced various suggested emissions reduction schemes to meet the target, and stated without damaging the economy which is what the Morrison Government pledged with an aspirational goal to work towards net zero and based on new technology developments (for Australia nuclear power stations an example and providing zero emissions).
China is arguably the major beneficiary of the Lima (Protocol) Agreement 1975 and following including Agenda 30 as it now is. And China (CCP) have taken advantage of Free Trade Agreements and have at times breached the terms and conditions applicable, example the COVID-19 requests from several governments including Morrison Australia for an inquiry into the source of the virus and in return the CCP blocked goods from import into China.
Australia achieved and exceeded the emissions target of Kyoto Agreement, the Australian approach was based on common sense and economic prosperity continuing. China and most other signatory nations did not achieve their emissions targets. During the Paris Conference period the UN IPCC refused Australia requested credits for achieving Kyoto targets.
The story as many know is much more detailed. One point is that Mr Donald Trump a US businessman has opposed the climate change based trade agreement and related advantages given to developing nations from the beginning and as first term President he acted to rectify the declining manufacturing industry and trade imbalances including dumping goods onto the US market by China, raising their industry economies of scale in production costs advantage and earning valuable foreign currency from the exports and so on.
And now in 2026 this report that in my opinion seals the fate of net zero emissions politics, a complete waste of taxpayer’s monies and undermining economic prosperity to the advantage of other countries such as China the main beneficiary nation.
90
Gosh, what could the reason be?
From https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/electricity_prices/
Average prices US$/kWh domestic and business.
China 7.6c | 9.7c
Australia 25.6c | 24.0c
USA 18.4c | 14.8c
China has just about the cost in Australia before John Howard initiated the destruction of our energy supply.
120
Around half of the fuel pricing in Australia is Federal and State taxes.
As for Howard Government signing Kyoto Agreement 1997 and emissions target, there were well publicised safety nets based on common sense proposals invited and without damaging the economy a priority. The Howard Government left office in November 2007 and handed over a strongly performing economy, zero debt after repaying the 1995/96 Labor debt inheritance and budget deficit, managed budgets in surplus apart from East Timor deployment year, weathered the Asia Economic Meltdown without problems here, created sovereign wealth Future Fund now with investments close to $300 billion and after paying public service pensions every year past to date, a $22 billion budget surplus for 2007/08 and other achievements including major tax reforms including Income Tax Brackets cut and more cuts scheduled years ahead until last 1 July 2010 that Labor honoured.
The rot set in when the after 2007 emission trading scheme debates and arguments started and Copenhagen COP flop that rejected emissions trading despite hundreds of delegates supporting Labor PM Rudd.
70
Here’s Dr Pielke’s quote for deaths from extreme weather events for 2025 and please note the horrendous death rate in 1960 compared to the last 30 years.
“If those estimates prove accurate, that would make 2025 among the lowest in total deaths from extreme weather events. Ever! I am cautious here because the recent decade or so has seen many years with similarly low totals — notably 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018, 2021”.
“What we can say with some greater confidence is that the death rate from extreme weather events is the lowest ever at less than 0.8 deaths per 1,000,000 people (with population data from the United Nations). Only 2018 and 2015 are close”.
“To put the death rate into perspective, consider that:
in 1960 it was >320 per 1,000,000;
in 1970, >80;
in 1980, ~3;
in 1990, ~1.3;
“Since 2000, six years have occurred with <1.0 deaths per 1,000,000 people, all since 2014. From 1970 to 2025 the death rate dropped by two orders of magnitude. This is an incredible story of human ingenuity and progress".
"To be sure, there is some luck involved as large losses of life are still possible — For instance, 2008 saw almost 150,000 deaths and a death rate of ~21 per 1,000,000. Large casualty events remain a risk that requires our constant attention and preparation".
"But make no mistake, 2025 is not unique, but part of a much longer-term trend of reduced vulnerability and improved preparation for extreme events. Underlying this trend lies the successful application of science, technology, and policy in a world that has grown much wealthier and thus far better equipped to protect people when, inevitably, extreme events do occur".
"Bravo World!"
100
The Chinese have always known man made climate change is a scam and they’re just playing along.
140
Also consider the visit to Australia by the Prime Minister of Canada and his opposition to the MAGA Trump initiatives including dumping climate related handbrakes. He has talked about a new world order of middle nations to stand together to protect from the much larger nations influences.
Read about Fabian Society of Marxists founded in the UK late 1800s, Australian Fabian Society and ALP club effectively, the aims and objectives referred to as new world order.
100
Canada’s Carney is a dangerous person on an active mission to deprive individuals of their customary say in the futures of their countries. He has a better plan than democracy, he claims. Geoff S
180
Ex governor of the Bank of England, Carney, is just another bought and paid for globalist prig. Foundation Board member of the W.E.F., member of the W.E.F. ‘group of thirty’ and U.N. special envoy for climate and finance. You are judged by the company you keep, in this case, the biggest nest of vermin in the world.
130
Infiltration of organisations of influence included Chartered Accounts Australia & New Zealand. Around the WEF you will own nothing and be happy times, pandemic period, the Sydney HQ advertised a seminar for members (Chartered Accountants) to learn about how to Build Back Better.
30
Carney was the Governor of the Bank of England who ended Liz Truss’ political career when she attempted to do something about the increasingly parlous state of the UK’s finances.
It was Carney who led the charge against her because what she wanted to do went against his agenda.
50
Also, do most people realise that the Australian Communist Party rebranded itself to the much more benign-sounding Search Foundation?
80
And that Labor (Communist faction) Attorney General Evatt was responsible for convincing his UN comrades who had infiltrated soon after the UN was established to sign as many agreements and agenda with member nations and they legislate and create regulations to impose UN objectives, legislation based on UN and getting around sovereign nation constitutions.
50
The question is: what deal have the vassal states made with China to run dead on China’s massive coal expansion? There must be some understanding (not written down, if Dan Andrews is any indication) that the west and selected useful idiots in media, social media, politics and bureaucracy shut up about China’s emissions. It’s got the feel of an organised crime protection racket. Stock our goodies, keep shtum and we’ll “look after” you.
80
Former Liberal MP and Minister later Speaker of the House of Parliament Canberra House or Representatives, Bronwyn Bishop, has commented many times at Sky as a guest panelist to be wary of Labor left ambitions and Australia becoming a Vassal State of China.
70
>what deal…?
…keep shtum and we’ll “look after” you.
Unlike the Western nations, there’s no need to disenfranchise China’s people and destroy their sovereignty because they’re already totalitarian, and politically communist.
00
The sarcastic “polluter” is incorrect.
19
But per capita they are doing their bit, obviously they have no concerns in saving the planet.
71
So can anyone tell us where to find the extreme weather death rates that concern them since 1900?
Population at risk in 1900 1.6 billion,2 billion by 1926, 2.5 billion at risk in 1950, 3 billion by 1960. See UN data.
Where’s the problem in the last 60 years and the 21st century has easily recorded the lowest death rates in the last 126 years.
IOW this easily proves we’re living in the safest period in Human history, so what’s their problem?
And population at risk today is 8.2 billion. Does anyone not understand the data?
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/natural-disaster-death-rates?country=Extreme+temperature~Drought~Wildfire~Extreme+weather~Flood
81
So why do wealthy countries with higher co2 emissions also have the lowest death rates from fires and burns?
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/fire-death-rates?tab=line&country=OWID_WRL~OWID_LIC~OWID_HIC~OWID_UMC~OWID_LMC~African+Region+%28WHO%29~AUS
91
Link to this extracted comment by a UN Official 2015 has been posted here a few times …
50
The concept of “common but differentiated responsibilities” is an artefact of the 1992 Rio Declaration:
Principle 7
States shall cooperate in a spirit of global partnership to conserve, protect and restore the health and integrity of the Earth’s ecosystem. In view of the different contributions to global environmental degradation, States have common but differentiated responsibilities. The developed countries acknowledge the responsibility that they bear in the international pursuit of sustainable development in view of the pressures their societies place on the
global environment and of the technologies and financial resources they
command.
https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf
Arguably understandable, given that in 1992 China was an economic basket case, emerging from Mao, nervously watching the collapse of the Soviet Union – and on the brink of a humanitarian disaster.
But just look at her now.
Fun Facts: Since 1992, China has emitted ~290Gt of Satan’s Gas. Over 50% of the US’s guesstimated total since the mid-19th century industrial explosion – and approximately 15% of the whole World’s contribution since 1800. (Thanks Claude, for integrating under the OWID chart.)
On the way through, each of the pious Rio principles has been roughly trampled – to the uncritical applause of useful idiots and the climatocracy. Larfing.
So, an ideal candidate to lead ‘global climate governance’.
Whatever that is.
70
Ina few words – transfer of wealth from developed nations to developing nations UN by order.
50
Except China is hardly a developing nation.
50
Not now but the United Nations continues to list China as one of the developing nations created 1975 for Lima (Protocol) Agreement purposes.
And this is another reason for MAGA Trump
30
“China’s carbon emissions have lifted off with a rocket”
Good Lord why are you complaining, you sound like a green. Aren’t carbon emissions a good thing? Also why are you complaining that China wants to rule the world? At least being ruled by China would be better than being ruled by the Fatmerican loony bin, the other contender.
00