- JoNova - https://www.joannenova.com.au -

mRNA vaccines produce huge amounts of Spike protein and for two months!

They told us the mRNA in the injections wouldn’t last long, barely a few days, and the protein spikes made from the vaccines would only stick around for “a few weeks”. But now, after 60% of the worlds population has been vaccinated, now we find out that the CCP bioweapon spikes are still there in lymph nodes two months after the last injection, and so is some of the mRNA. And we don’t know how much longer those spikes keep churning out, because no one has done that study.

Pause for a moment to wonder how it is that we could inject four billion people “for health reasons” yet no one knew the most basic things about how it worked, like, how long the vaccine mRNA might survive, and keep producing spikes for, or how many spikes it might keep making.

Now comes the bad news that mRNA-vaccinated people may be making more spikes than severely ill Covid patients, and that the mRNA survives much longer than anyone expected.

A Health Public Policy Nightmare

Robert Malone

The hidden highlight (lede) buried in this peer reviewed paper is that protein production of spike in people vaccinated with the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients!

This study asserts that the mRNA and the spike protein produced persists for weeks in lymph node germinal centers in human patients. Having worked with mRNA for decades, I can attest that this is highly unusual.

Figure 6. Disrupted LN GCs in COVID-19 patients versus mRNA vaccinees.

Click to enlarge. Figure 6. Disrupted Lymph Nodes GCs in COVID-19 patients versus mRNA vaccinees. (B) Representative immunohistochemistry of GCs with CD21 (left), BCL6 (middle) and PD-1 (right) in peribronchial LNs of an autopsy patient who died of COVID-19, a control autopsy patient who died from a non-COVID-19 pneumonia (pre-pandemic), and in an axillary Lymph node of a patient vaccinated with a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine.

To stop the mRNA from being degraded as normal RNA would be, the manufacturers used a synthetic type of nucleic acid — a pseudo-uridine instead of the normal uridine. Is it a bit like the plastic waste that takes years longer to breakdown in landfill? Could be. All our normal enzymes that chop up RNA might be stuck, flummoxed, and the mRNA might last for months…

One very real hypothesis is that the substitution of pseudouridine for uridine to avoid the immune response is working so well that the mRNA is completely evading the normal clearance/degradation pathways. Hence, mRNA that is not being incorporated into cells at the injection site, is migrating to the lymph nodes (and throughout the body as the non-clinical Pfizer data suggest?) and continuing to express protein there. In this case, the cytotoxic protein antigen is spike. Spike protein can be detected for at least 60 days after administration of dose. Note that the duration of the protein expression was only tested for 60 days.

In Figure 7 the researchers found vaccine mRNA in the GCs of Lymph Nodes  up to day 37 post vaccination (middle column), but there was still a lower but “appreciable specific signal” of mRNA even at day 60. The Spike was found even up to day 60 (right column).

mRNA vaccines lymph nodes 60 days later.

Click to enlarge | Fig 7: (B) Representative in situ hybridization of an RNAScope control probe (left panels) and SARS CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-specific probe (middle panels) within ipsilateral axillary core needle Lymph Node biopsies of female patients 7 to 60 days  after second mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 dose. Probe hybridization is indicated by red chromogen spots. IHC signal for spike antigen (right panels), is detected as granular brown staining.

More spike than a severe case of Covid:

… the study quantitatively measured spike protein levels in plasma after vaccination. Which, it turns out, are higher than the levels observed in a person with a severe COVID-19 infection. Just to write it, the fact that this only now being discovered or it it was known, released to the public is criminal in my opinion. This should have been characterized long ago, including prior to beginning human clinical trials.

The biggest medical experiment ever….

That this has not been published or investigated more demonstrates the gross regulatory dereliction of duty by Pfizer, Biointech, Moderna, NIAID VRC and that whole crew. Using these vaccines, which include pseudouridine without fully understanding the implications and without the FDA requiring a complete pre-clinical toxicology regulatory package, including long-term follow-up, as is done with any other unique chemical or adjuvant additive is shocking.

So many institutions have failed us

It’s not just the corporate Pharma giants who have failed the public. What about the CDC, the FDA, the TGA, the Chief Health Officers, and all the professors at our public funded universities that didn’t ask the right questions, that assured us the vaccines were safe and the mRNA would be degraded quickly?

What about all the publicly funded science journalists at the BBC, ABC, CBC and NPR etc? That’s a lot of science unit investigative reporters who didn’t investigate. What do we pay public broadcasters to do — if not to grill scientists about the most important health policy decisions in the last 30 years?

The length of time the spike is produced for could have all kinds of effects. Not only will it increase the adverse effects, but if it is expressed too long, it could even reduce the immunity, or desensitize people to the very thing they are meant to be sensitized too. We really don’t know.

Robert Malone wonders if the pseudouridine was just the cheap option to avoid paying out on patents:

To note: The use of pseudouridine in these mRNA vaccines is not the only option. It has often been hypothesized that the reason Dr. Kariko added pseudouridine to the mRNA vaccine was to make an improvement to the original mRNA patents that I was an inventor on. An improvement to an existing patent allows commercialization of that patent. It is an old trick. Remember, that Curevac does not use pseudouridine in its formulation and it is not required or necessary for a significant immune response.

We had so many better choices

Covid, Coronavirus, Bioweapons.The mRNA technology is so new and risky. There are too many moving parts and unknowns. I’ve said before that we didn’t know how much protein spike people might make, and it was obvious that some people might make a lot more spike than others. At least with a protein-vaccine, like Novavax or the Australian Covax-19 the injection has a fixed amount of protein.  We know what we’re getting. It’s still a nasty spike, a bad protein, and it’s still an out of date version of a virus that doesn’t exist anywhere — but there is a known quantity, and it’s not being made inside your own cells and displayed on healthy normal cells. That in itself ought to reduce the risk of autoimmune diseases like myocarditis.

Hat tip to Matthew L, David E.

In response to a question from Strop on why this matters:

The issue is mRNA is an entirely new technology, which has not even had basic testing and research done on it, and they’ve been lying about all of that.

They say they care about our health, but if they did, they would have done this testing and in 2020. That failure and deception is criminal.

If we had informed consent they would have told us how uncertain it was.

If people are being double dosed on a three week schedule, the first dose is still being processed and present when the second dose goes in. No wonder the second dose is such an issue. In Toxicology, the dose makes the poison — yet we didn’t even realize that the second dose was a “double dose”.

The spike itself is toxic — it binds to 13 different receptors in our tissues including crucial ones like ACE2 which lowers blood pressure. If spikes are still wandering two months later, that’s a major potential risk. Does it increase blood clotting and stroke or heart attack risk for months, and how long?

Not only does this show Pfizer and Moderna lied for profit, but that they were assisted by Professors of Microbiology etc who went on TV and swore these injections were safe. It also shows the failure of all the regulatory agencies who should have been demanding this data before they would even consider approving them.

It shows we should have rushed any other kind of vaccine into production before we rushed a totally new and unknown technology into mass production.


Röltgen et al (2022) Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination Cell. Published:January 24, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.018

9.6 out of 10 based on 78 ratings